MISEforecast with expected covers, turnover band, capacity development and team advice for a catering day.
MISEhospitality intelligence logoHospitality intelligence

Hospitality intelligence / forecasting

MISE

A reproducible hospitality-proof with synthetic data that translates reservations, POS, tables, weather context and staff into a controllable daily plan — with the manager as the decision maker.

Interactive proof of concept

The case in 30 seconds

MISE

Problem
A reproducible hospitality-proof with synthetic data that translates reservations, POS, tables, weather context and staff into a controllable daily plan — with the manager as the decision maker.
Solution
A reproducible hospitality-proof with 546 synthetic days, 65 unseen test days, table model, staff scheduling and fail-closed data protection.
Role and focus
Data model, forecast core, operation UX, integrity
Status
Interactive proof of concept
Result
12-route demo, backtest, table and staff plan

Live lab / try it yourself

Enjoy a catering day

Choose a scenario and see how reservations, weather, tables, staff and turnover combine to create an actionable daily plan. This case interaction is a scenario simulator; the fullMISEdemo uses the validated data layer.

01 / InputDay, demand and capacityYou can change or choose this yourself
02 / SystemForecasting and operational planningRidge regression · Out-of-sample backtest · SHA-256 integrity · Scenario simulator
03 / EvidenceA verifiable work planThis makes the operation visible
QuestionHow is today going?
DecisionPeople,MISE-en-place, terrace
DatesLocal and context sensitive
TrustSources visible
Brand vision / preparation as a decision system

Everything is ready before the service starts

MISErefers directly toMISE-en-place: the catering language for good preparation. The logo connects table, timing and central decision without the maritime association of the previous work name.

Operating model / floor and capacity

The floor becomes legible before service

The forecast does not end with a number. The designed table plans make visible how capacity, routing and preparation come together in a verifiable work plan.

Designed demo material from theMISEZwolle setup. The plans show the operational structure; the forecast uses reproducible synthetic data.

Forecasting on the floor

From forecast to work plan

The outcome is not “82% pressure”.MISEsays when the crowds will come, where guests are likely to want to sit, which preparations require extra time and which signals are uncertain.

Hospitality atmosphere with tables and chairs under a striped awning.
Simulated operation

Reservations, cash register and planning

Reproducible covers, turnover per hour, no-shows, dishes, employees and preparation form the testable basis.

Live and researched context

Weather, roadwork and events

The full demo uses current Open-Meteo context. Permits, closures and events are designed integration routes, not connected feeds.

Investigated signals

Competition without false security

Deals, reviews and tourism data remain integration options with source quality and local relevance; they are not presented as live truth.

Play through the day

Four scenarios, four different workplaces

Click on a scenario. The forecast not only changes the expected turnover, but also the concrete preparation and the certainty with whichMISEadvises.

Interactive daily moments

MISE/ Brasserie De KadeSunday · forecast at 08:15
Expected covers per hourBandwidth and deployment time
Scale up the team
Scenario outcome184 coversBandwidth 163 to 205
Substantiated trust83%3 of 4 sources active

Reservations determine the basis; weather and local context drive terrace, peak and preparation.

Prepare the terrace first83% confidence · 3 active sources
Covers184+22% vs normal
Peak13:10terrace 76%
Extra starts2 × 60m09:30 patio crew

09:30

Cushions, umbrellas and outdoor station

11:00

Extra cold drinksMISE-en-place

12:30

Second runner to terrace

16:00

Reforecast with current covers

Inner route and quick changeover88% confidence · 3 active sources
Covers132terrace uncertain
Rain14:05± 25 minutes
OccupancyCompact1 late shift postponeable

10:00

Open completely inside

12:00

Limited use of terrace

13:35

Pillows in signal

15:00

Replenish hot drinks

Early family crowds expected72% confidence · 3 active sources
Covers211peak shifts
Passers-by+1.4k125m radius
MenuQuickshorten the lunch menu

09:00

Extra children's set and high chairs

10:30

Grab-and-go station ready

11:40

First peak before reservations

14:30

Recalibrate stock and waiting time

Car inflow lower, local guests stable68% confidence · 3 active sources
Covers119−18% forecast
Walk-ins−31%car traffic
Team−1 shiftstandby at 4:00 PM

08:30

Publish accessibility message

10:00

Make the cycle route visible

12:00

Do not release additional purchases

16:00

Reassess reservations

Human control Scenario not yet applied to planning, purchasing or team.

Design boundary: the numbers are demonstration dates. In a pilot, source quality, local influence and margin of error are calibrated per restaurant; a manager always holds the final personnel and purchasing decisions. Open the full 18-month data and personnel proof.

Forecasting with evidence

Test before adjusting

MISEnot only makes a forecast visible, but also compares it with a fixed test period. The system then translates that outcome into capacity, routing and preparation on the floor.

MISEbacktest with margin of error, calibration and comparison between forecast methods.
Backtest Margin of error, calibration and the next line of evidence remain visible.
MISETable studio with restaurant zones, 162 seats, routes and capacity.
Operation Forecast translated into zones, capacity and an executable floor plan.
Model and divorceRidge regression

323 training days and 65 unseen synthetic testing days, with seven forecast vintages and protection against target leakage.

Backtest7.86% WAPE

Compared to 18.65% for the four-week baseline. This validates the reproducible proof, not the commercial accuracy of a restaurant pilot.

Operational model55 objects · 162 chairs

Table capacity, routing and staff deployment are included as controllable source objects in the work plan.

Integrity42 files fail closed

SHA-256, release version and stale source check block a damaged or outdated data layer before use.

My contribution: data model, forecast core, table and staff logic, twelve-route product architecture, interface, integrity layer, test chain and visual system development.

Range: the backtest is a controlled proof with demonstration data; it supports a decision, but does not replace a local calibration or manager decision.

Data quality

Not every source deserves the same trust

Each input is given a separate score for topicality, local relevance, historical predictive value and availability.

A / High

Simulated operational data

Reservations and checkout form reproducible test data and are calibrated per hour and type of day.

B / Context

Public local signals

Live weather context is connected; permits and traffic remain investigated integration routes until a source contract is in place.

C / Indicative

Market and competition data

Reviews and deals are possible signals, not truth. They are only used if source quality and local coherence are demonstrable.

Prepare the terrace first

Weather and preparation determine the opening.

Lunch peak

Reservations and passers-by control the floor.

Reforecast

Current covers replace old assumptions.

Evening plan

Team and stock follow the latest context.

Independent concept case with demonstration data. Photography: Bayram Yalçın and Seher Doğan via Pexels. The restaurant is fictional; brand and interface are designed for this portfolio case.

The flagship series

Four other forms of intelligent experience

From freight and ownership experience to evidence and spatial magic.